NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 5.1x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1572 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14694 vs 12920
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 797
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 142.691
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1797.792 vs 1729.558
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 12.693
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13339
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13339

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• Around 68% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2432
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71298 vs 55343
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.376 vs 26.444
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 1035.984
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3638
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3638

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14694 12920
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	875 797
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55343 71298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.11 142.691
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1797.792 1729.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.071 12.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.444 111.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035.984 1396.172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 13339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 13339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3353

Compare specifications (specs)