NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 5.1x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14690 vs 12920
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 797
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 142.691
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1797.792 vs 1729.558
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 12.693
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13339
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14690 vs 12920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 797 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 vs 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 vs 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 vs 12.693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 13339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- Around 68% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2432
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71304 vs 55343
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.376 vs 26.444
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 1035.984
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2432 |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops vs 8,186 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71304 vs 55343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14690 | 12920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55343 | 71304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | 142.691 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | 1729.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | 12.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | 111.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | 1396.172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 243 | 242 |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | 11,059 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |