NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 Nano videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 256.0 GTexel / s
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 8,192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 57% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 vs 4579
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 27 August 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s vs 256.0 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops vs 8,192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 vs 4579 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 50x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 10 GB/s
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 | 4579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Fiji |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 27 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | $649 |
Place in performance rating | 258 | 261 |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | 8,192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s | 256.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |