NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 722 MHz
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 69.31 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1536
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 2,218 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 3568
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 556
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2017 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 722 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s vs 69.31 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 2,218 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 3568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 556 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 | 3568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | 556 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | GM204 |
Launch date | 10 March 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 219 | 217 |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 722 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | 69.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |