NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 8,602 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 2.8x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 4 GB
• 10.5x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18583 vs 9580
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 803
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 155.307
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 12.49
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 857.575
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 8673
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 2406.499
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 25.833
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3716
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3716
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 2228

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18583 9580
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	935 803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.837 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2406.499 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.591 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.833 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002.573 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2228 5170

Compare specifications (specs)