NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon R7 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 975 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
12.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6420 vs 4519
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 7102
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 7102
2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 1499

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 Mar 2020 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6420 vs 4519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780 vs 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780 vs 7102
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172 vs 1499

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 334
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 39479
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1982
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1982

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	605 vs 334
Geekbench - OpenCL	86561 vs 39479
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6420

4519

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

334

605

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39479

86561

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3359

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3172

1499

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R7 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	6420	4519
PassMark - G2D Mark	334	605
Geekbench - OpenCL	39479	86561
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2168	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1982	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2168	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1982	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172	1499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		359.237

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R7 370
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	N18P-G62	Trinidad
Launch date	16 Mar 2020	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	437	407
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	975 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	1024
Floating-point performance		1,997 gflops
Stream Processors		1024
Texture fill rate		62.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		110 Watt
Transistor count		2,800 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		152 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
OpenGL		4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	975 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		179.2 GB/s
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)