NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E8950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

AMD Radeon E8950

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1000 MHz
544.7x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.441 vs 66.837
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.882 vs 6.633
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 65.836
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.498 vs 326.391

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2019 vs 29 September 2015
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	69.72 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	129.441 vs 66.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.882 vs 6.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.563 vs 65.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	346.498 vs 326.391

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950

2.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 896
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 1047.138

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 896
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1369.722 vs 1047.138

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

129.441

66.837

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1047.138

1369.722

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.882

6.633

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

78.563

65.836

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

346.498

326.391

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	AMD Radeon E8950
PassMark - G3D Mark	6160
PassMark - G2D Mark	326
Geekbench - OpenCL	35607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	129.441	66.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1047.138	1369.722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.882	6.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.563	65.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	346.498	326.391
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2950

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	AMD Radeon E8950
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Code name	TU117	Amethyst
Launch date	23 April 2019	29 September 2015
Place in performance rating	459	734
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1245 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	735 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines	896	2048
Pixel fill rate	39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	69.72 GTexel/s	128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	95 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	5,000 million
Floating-point performance		4,096 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	192.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5