NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 185 Watt
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 116.142
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1047.553 vs 1022.932
  • 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2954 vs 1005
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 April 2019 vs 18 April 2017
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 185 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 129.465 vs 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1047.553 vs 1022.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2954 vs 1005

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580

  • Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1020 MHz
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1245 MHz
  • 2.8x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
  • 2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 6222
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 326
  • Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 36290
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 7.88
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 78.563
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 346.529
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 8824
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 8824
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1257 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed 1340 MHz vs 1245 MHz
Texture fill rate 192.96 GTexel/s vs 69.72 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2304 vs 896
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8827 vs 6222
PassMark - G2D Mark 767 vs 326
Geekbench - OpenCL 39028 vs 36290
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.235 vs 7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 84.034 vs 78.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 607.721 vs 346.529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11281 vs 8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11281 vs 8824

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6222
8827
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
326
767
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36290
39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
129.465
116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047.553
1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.88
9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
78.563
84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
346.529
607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8824
11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8824
11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2954
1005
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark 6222 8827
PassMark - G2D Mark 326 767
Geekbench - OpenCL 36290 39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 129.465 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1047.553 1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.88 9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 78.563 84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 346.529 607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8824 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8824 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2954 1005

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q AMD Radeon RX 580

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 4.0
Code name TU117 Polaris 20
Launch date 23 April 2019 18 April 2017
Place in performance rating 447 341
Type Laptop Desktop
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch price (MSRP) $229
Price now $169.99
Value for money (0-100) 76.21

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1245 MHz 1340 MHz
Core clock speed 1020 MHz 1257 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines 896 2304
Pixel fill rate 39.84 GPixel/s 42.88 GP/s
Texture fill rate 69.72 GTexel/s 192.96 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 185 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 5,700 million
Compute units 36
Floating-point performance 6.2 TFLOPs
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2304
Texture Units 144

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Bridgeless CrossFire
Length 241 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 256 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) 8000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready