NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 326
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.46 vs 78.563
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 587.99 vs 346.529
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 23 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 vs 78.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 vs 346.529 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 42.24 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6175 vs 4547
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36420 vs 34411
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 102.448
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1047.553 vs 1017.021
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 4.996
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s vs 42.24 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6175 vs 4547 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36420 vs 34411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 vs 102.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.553 vs 1017.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 vs 4.996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 326 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4547 | 6175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34411 | 36420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | 129.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | 1047.553 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | 7.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | 78.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 | 346.529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU117 | TU117 |
Launch date | 2022 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 471 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1245 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | 69.72 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.462 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS | 2.231 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | 69.72 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |