NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1245 MHz versus 900 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 69.72 GTexel/s versus 160.5 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36341 versus 23230
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 versus 57.735
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 versus 5.505
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 versus 37.407
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.529 versus 174.323
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2954 versus 2797
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 23 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 863 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s versus 160.5 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36341 versus 23230 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 versus 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 versus 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 versus 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.529 versus 174.323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 versus 2797 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 2.6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 896
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8007 versus 6169
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 versus 326
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 versus 1047.553
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 versus 8824
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 versus 8824
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 896 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8007 versus 6169 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 versus 326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 versus 1047.553 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 versus 8824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 versus 8824 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6169 | 8007 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 587 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36341 | 23230 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 | 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.553 | 1269.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.529 | 174.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 | 2797 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Nom de code | TU117 | GK110 |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 23 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 471 | 468 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Prix maintenant | $740.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 863 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2304 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |