NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 550

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1183 MHz
• 3645x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 2690
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 476
• 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 11610
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 33.507
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 1037.305
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 vs 3.064
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 52.533
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 140.911
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 4485
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 940
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2158
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 4485
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 940
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2158
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 352 vs 127

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10180 2690
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 476
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55838 11610
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.014 33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961.932 1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.169 3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.29 52.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	787.025 140.911
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2158
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	352 127

Compare specifications (specs)