NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus AMD Radeon RX 550

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 550 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

versus

AMD Radeon RX 550

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1100 MHz
Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1183 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
2.5x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 512
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 versus 2690
Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 476
4.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 versus 11610
5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 33.507
Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 versus 1037.305
3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 versus 3.064
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 versus 52.533
5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 140.911
3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 4485
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 940
Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2158
3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 4485
4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 940
Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2158
2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 352 versus 127

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 Nov 2019 versus 18 April 2017
Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz versus 1100 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1183 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	138.0 GTexel/s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 versus 512
Processus de fabrication	12 nm versus 14 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	10180 versus 2690
PassMark - G2D Mark	751 versus 476
Geekbench - OpenCL	55838 versus 11610
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.014 versus 33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1961.932 versus 1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.169 versus 3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	109.29 versus 52.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	787.025 versus 140.911
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569 versus 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 versus 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 versus 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569 versus 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 versus 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 versus 2158
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	352 versus 127

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550

2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 100 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt versus 100 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10180

2690

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

751

476

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

55838

11610

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

178.014

33.507

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1961.932

1037.305

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.169

3.064

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

109.29

52.533

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

787.025

140.911

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

4485

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

940

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

2158

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

4485

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

940

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

2158

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

352

127

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark	10180	2690
PassMark - G2D Mark	751	476
Geekbench - OpenCL	55838	11610
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.014	33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1961.932	1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.169	3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	109.29	52.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	787.025	140.911
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569	4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569	4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	2158
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	352	127

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 550
Essentiel
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Nom de code	TU116	Lexa
Date de sortie	22 Nov 2019	18 April 2017
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	283	876
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		Radeon RX 500 Series
Génération GCN		4th Gen
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$79
Prix maintenant		$75
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		59.51
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz	1183 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz	1100 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	512
Pixel fill rate	55.20 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	138.0 GTexel/s	37.86 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt
Compte de transistor	6600 million	2,200 million
Performance á point flottant		1.2 TFLOPs
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Longeur	9 inches (229 mm)	145 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt	400 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin	None
Largeur	Dual-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192 GB/s	112 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	128 bit
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR5
Vitesse de mémoire		7000 MHz
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)