NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus AMD Radeon RX 5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 162.36 GT/s
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10163 versus 8787
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 741
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55745 versus 44375
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 12069
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 12069
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 7 Oct 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 162.36 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10163 versus 8787 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 741 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55745 versus 44375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1670 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- 13.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 versus 353
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1670 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3715 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 versus 353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10163 | 8787 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 741 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55745 | 44375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 353 | 4813 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Nom de code | TU116 | |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 7 Oct 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 255 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1845 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | 10.4 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | 5.2 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | 59 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 162.36 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 6400 million |
Unités de Compute | 22 | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |