NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 590
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER und AMD Radeon RX 590 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 4% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1469 MHz
- Etwa 12% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 75% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 100 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10163 vs 9390
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55772 vs 45900
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 137.469
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 762.142
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 13383
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 13383
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 22 Nov 2019 vs 15 November 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1469 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10163 vs 9390 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55772 vs 45900 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 vs 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 vs 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 13383 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 590
- Etwa 61% höhere Texturfüllrate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 750
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 1961.932
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 vs 11.169
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 109.29
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4757 vs 4663
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 vs 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 vs 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 vs 109.29 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4757 vs 4663 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10163 | 9390 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55772 | 45900 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4663 | 4757 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | TU116 | Polaris 30 |
Startdatum | 22 Nov 2019 | 15 November 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 277 | 278 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 1469 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
Texturfüllrate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt | 175 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 9 inches (229 mm) | 241 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |