NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro K420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 9843.1x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 14.02 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4096x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB
- 13.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 733
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 288
- 30.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 1843
- 29.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 6
- 10.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 186.605
- 25.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 vs 0.433
- 10.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 10.365
- 44.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 17.75
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 1245
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 598
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1241
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 1245
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 598
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1241
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 22 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 14.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB / 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 vs 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 vs 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 vs 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 vs 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 vs 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 vs 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 vs 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1241 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K420
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro K420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 | 733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 | 1843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 186.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 0.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 10.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 17.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 1245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1241 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU116 | GK107 |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 283 | 1467 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $96.67 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.27 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 876 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 160 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | 1" (2.5 cm) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB / 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |