NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER und NVIDIA Tesla T4 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 52% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 590
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 127.622
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1976
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1781
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1976
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1781
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 22 Nov 2019 vs 13 September 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 vs 127.622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1781 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Etwa 33% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10744 vs 10162
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 55772
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1961.932
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 11.169
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 109.29
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 787.025
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 13569
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 13569
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 vs 10162 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 55772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 13569 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10162 | 10744 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55772 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4663 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU116 | TU104 |
Startdatum | 22 Nov 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 277 | 279 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 138.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 13,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | None |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 10000 MHz |