NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1290 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • 314.8x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 62
  • 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 57
  • 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 62
  • 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 57
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 Nov 2019 vs 27 March 2018
Core clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Boost clock speed 1725 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Texture fill rate 138.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 57
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 57

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

  • 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 55744
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 13569
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 13569
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 5120 vs 1280
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 131696 vs 55744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19081 vs 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19081 vs 13569

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
55744
131696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13569
19081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
57
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13569
19081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
57
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 10166
PassMark - G2D Mark 750
Geekbench - OpenCL 55744 131696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 787.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13569 19081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 57
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13569 19081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 57
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4659

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

Essentials

Architecture Turing Volta
Code name TU116 GV100
Launch date 22 Nov 2019 27 March 2018
Place in performance rating 269 272
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1725 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1530 MHz 1290 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1280 5120
Pixel fill rate 55.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 138.0 GTexel/s 438.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 6600 million 21,100 million
Floating-point performance 14,029 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Width Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 897.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 4096 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
Memory clock speed 1752 MHz