NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- 314.8x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 57
- 59.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 55744
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 13569
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 13569
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 55744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 13569 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10166 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 | 131696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 57 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU116 | GV100 |
Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 269 | 272 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz |