NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 451.3x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 8 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 150.951
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 1718.593
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 28.289
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3691
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3340
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3691
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 7539
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 380
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47476 vs 41907
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 10.681
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 644.098
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 12180
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 12180
• Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 3656

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 10465
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 603
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 5536

Compare specifications (specs)