NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3359
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3359
• 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 1065

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 7539
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 380
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 41907
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 152.235
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 vs 1843.045
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 10.681
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 644.098
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 12180
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 11659
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 776
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 58014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 189.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 1902.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 13.408
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 116.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 875.838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 14998
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 14998
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 1065

Compare specifications (specs)