NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3359
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3359
- 3.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 1065
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 14 March 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 1065 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- 5.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 versus 7539
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 versus 380
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 versus 41907
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 versus 152.235
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 versus 1843.045
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 versus 10.681
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 644.098
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 12180
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 12180
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 versus 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 versus 41907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 versus 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 versus 1843.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 versus 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 versus 115.607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 644.098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 12180 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 11659 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 776 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 58014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 189.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 1902.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 13.408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 116.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 875.838 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 1065 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 14 March 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 258 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8004 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
