NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1140 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1335 MHz
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 365
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 94.964
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 vs 492.867
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3358
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8627 vs 7568
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 41971
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 151.899
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1844.67
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 10.683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 12180
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 12180
• Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4915 vs 3668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7568 8627
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 365
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41971 53834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 492.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3668 4915

Compare specifications (specs)