NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1140 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1485 MHz versus 1335 MHz
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 versus 364
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 versus 94.964
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.054 versus 492.867
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3358
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 23 April 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1140 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz versus 1335 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 versus 364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 versus 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 versus 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8626 versus 7568
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 versus 41946
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 151.899
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 1844.67
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 10.683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 12180
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 12180
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4905 versus 3666
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 versus 7568 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 versus 41946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 151.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 1844.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 10.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 12180 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 versus 3666 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7568 | 8626 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | 53834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 | 4905 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 273 | 333 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | 128.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
