NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1201 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 3676
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 17696
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 55.077
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 830.773
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 4.132
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 82.584
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 225.985
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2678
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2678

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 3676
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 634
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 17696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 225.985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2678

Compare specifications (specs)