NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce 920MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 965 MHz
  • Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 993 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1068
  • 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 150
  • 9.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 3954
  • 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 1764
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3691
  • 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 1764
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3691
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 April 2019 vs 25 March 2016
Core clock speed 1485 MHz vs 965 MHz
Boost clock speed 1665 MHz vs 993 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7881 vs 1068
PassMark - G2D Mark 564 vs 150
Geekbench - OpenCL 39165 vs 3954
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10959 vs 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10959 vs 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3691

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

  • Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 385 vs 305
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 385 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7881
1068
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
564
150
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39165
3954
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10959
1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10959
1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
305
385
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
PassMark - G3D Mark 7881 1068
PassMark - G2D Mark 564 150
Geekbench - OpenCL 39165 3954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 573.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10959 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10959 1764
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 305 385

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

Essentials

Architecture Turing Maxwell
Code name TU107 GM108
Launch date 30 April 2019 25 March 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $179
Place in performance rating 376 1001
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1665 MHz 993 MHz
Core clock speed 1485 MHz 965 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Floating-point performance 602.1 gflops
Pipelines 256
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 16 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort count 1
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 1800 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers