NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1006 MHz
• Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 5590
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 531
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 18376
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 46.086
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 989.685
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 4.645
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 36.463
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 99.577
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 7222
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3666
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3306
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 7222
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3666
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• 6.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 5590
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 18376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3306
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 2004

Compare specifications (specs)