NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 1006 MHz
- Environ 57% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 5590
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 531
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 18376
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 46.086
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 989.685
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 4.645
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 36.463
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 99.577
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3666
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3306
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3666
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 1006 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 5590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- 6.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 versus 305
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 5590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Nom de code | TU107 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 22 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 544 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 2048 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256-bit GDDR5 | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |