NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 823 MHz
• Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 888 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 11782

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

• 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1333 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 11782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 1333

Compare specifications (specs)