NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 540 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 72.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 108
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 576 vs 481
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 6 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 vs 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 vs 481 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 | 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 | 481 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39403 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
Code name | TU107 | G98 |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 6 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 359 | 316 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 540 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
Floating-point performance | 17.28 gflops | |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR2 |