NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 4500
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 15667
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 71.86
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 832.248
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 4.039
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 65.117
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 245.081
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 6796
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 6796

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 564
• 5.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 4500
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 1591

Compare specifications (specs)