NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- 72.1x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 500 Watt
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 8621
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 768
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 29 April 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 vs 8621 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 vs 768 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 8621 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Vesuvius |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 29 April 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 207 | 174 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Price now | $1,099.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.14 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2x 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,733 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 307 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 640 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |