NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 614.2x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 vs 55424
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 182.11
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 1797.792
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 14.071
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 26.444
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3638
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 vs 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 vs 26.444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 73% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 12712
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 804
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 901.388
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1471 vs 1278
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 vs 901.388 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 vs 1278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 223 | 250 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |