NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 versus 55424
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 182.11
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 1797.792
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 14.071
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 26.444
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 16128
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3638
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 16128
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3638
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 2 November 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 versus 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 26.444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3344 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 73% de pipelines plus haut: 2432 versus 1408
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 versus 12712
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 versus 804
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 versus 901.388
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1471 versus 1278
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 versus 1408 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 versus 12712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 versus 804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 versus 901.388 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 versus 1278 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 1471 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 223 | 250 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |