NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 1658.6x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 6957
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 630
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62641 vs 22896
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 113.416
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 1414.794
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 6.736
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 81.206
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 417.823
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3316
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 1278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12712 6957
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	804 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	62641 22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1278 2958

Compare specifications (specs)