NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12777 vs 9322
• Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62617 vs 31487
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 121.124
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 1958.592
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 8.452
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 510.941
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1676
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1676
• Around 76% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5978 vs 3404

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 810
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 117.673

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12777 9322
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	810 918
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	62617 31487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 1676
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5978 3404

Compare specifications (specs)