NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 53% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- Environ 32% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 119.4 GTexel/s
- Environ 10% de pipelines plus haut: 1408 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 20% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 5 GB
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 versus 9321
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62624 versus 31476
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 121.124
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 1958.592
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 8.452
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 versus 510.941
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 1676
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 1676
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5978 versus 3404
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 10 June 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 1280 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 5 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 versus 9321 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 versus 31476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 121.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 1958.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 8.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 versus 510.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 1676 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 versus 3404 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 versus 810
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 117.673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 versus 810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 117.673 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 9321 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 920 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 31476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 121.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1958.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 8.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 120.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 510.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1676 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 3404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 10 June 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 305 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 4400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 201 mm (7.9") |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 5 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 160 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
