NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 and NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 41.9x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 150 nm
- 14x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 128 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 999 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 171.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 16 February 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 96
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 96 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 | 7 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kelvin |
Code name | GT200B | NV28 A2 |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 16 February 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Place in performance rating | 946 | 949 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 275 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 150 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 2x 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 216 mm |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | 4.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 275 MHz |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | SDR |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |