NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.6 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,045.6 gflops versus 855.4 gflops
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 versus 19.079
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 versus 741.303
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 versus 24.513
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 versus 64.492
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 versus 2999
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 versus 2999
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 24 September 2011 versus 31 May 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.6 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 1,045.6 gflops versus 855.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 versus 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 versus 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 versus 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 versus 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 versus 2999 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 778 MHz
- Environ 5% de pipelines plus haut: 352 versus 336
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2650 versus 1872
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 versus 418
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9276 versus 7872
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 versus 2.125
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 versus 3398
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 versus 3117
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 versus 3398
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 versus 3117
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 778 MHz |
Pipelines | 352 versus 336 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2650 versus 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 versus 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9276 versus 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 versus 2.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 versus 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 versus 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 versus 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 versus 3117 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1872 | 2650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7872 | 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3321 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF114 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 24 September 2011 | 31 May 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 839 | 842 |
Prix maintenant | $199.99 | $263.28 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.01 | 12.73 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 778 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,045.6 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 352 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.6 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
Performance de Compute | 30x | |
Noyaux CUDA | 352 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 210 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.2 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |