NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 170 Watt
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 539.966
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 35.841
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 vs 64.308

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 778 MHz
• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 43.6 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 vs 1872
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 418
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11002 vs 7872
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 vs 22.161
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 vs 2.125
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 3537
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3398
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3117
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 3537
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3398
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1872 3038
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	418 425
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7872 11002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.161 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	781.734 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.125 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.218 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.212 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3537 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3398 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3117 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3537 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3398 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3117 3333

Compare specifications (specs)