NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 34.0 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 448 vs 320
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,088.6 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) vs 1200 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3134 vs 401
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 320
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 3262
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 March 2010 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3134 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3317 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3317 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 215 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3134 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3317 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3317 | 3262 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF100 | M96 |
Launch date | 26 March 2010 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 790 | 792 |
Price now | $522.01 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 448 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 448 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 billion / sec | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 133.9 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |