NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 215 Watt
• 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
• 3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3559 vs 3111
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 407
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 10940
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 27.93
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 97.852
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3873
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3873

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1046 MHz
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 vs 588.094
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 vs 3.205
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 vs 30.455
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1577
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 1671
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1577
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3559 3111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	545 407
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12020 10940
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.695 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.094 980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.205 3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.455 47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.26 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 3317

Compare specifications (specs)