NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.2x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 215 Watt
3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3552 vs 3107
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 406
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 11010
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 27.93
Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 165.39 vs 97.852
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3873
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3873

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 26 March 2010
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
Pipelines	640 vs 448
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt vs 215 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1280 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3552 vs 3107
PassMark - G2D Mark	545 vs 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 11010
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 vs 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	165.39 vs 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 3873

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 vs 588.094
Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 vs 3.205
Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 vs 30.455
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1577
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 1671
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1577
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1215 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	980.005 vs 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.268 vs 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.309 vs 30.455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3614 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3317 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3614 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3317 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3552

3107

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

545

406

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12020

11010

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.695

27.93

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

588.094

980.005

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.205

3.268

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.455

47.309

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

165.39

97.852

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

3873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

3614

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3317

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

3873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

3614

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3317

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark	3552	3107
PassMark - G2D Mark	545	406
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020	11010
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695	27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094	980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205	3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455	47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	165.39	97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	3317
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Launch date	22 July 2014	26 March 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	$349
Place in performance rating	805	802
Price now	$343.99	$522.01
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	13.01	6.87
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	1215 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	640	448
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s	34.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
CUDA cores		448
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	202 mm	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pins
Bus support		16x PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1280 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	133.9 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround