NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 990
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 312
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 vs 1928
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 6.303
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 392.237
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 vs 0.597
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.232 vs 17.874
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1747
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 736 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 480 vs 288
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 50.114
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3114
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3356
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3114
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1914 990
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	423 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7009 1928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.456 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	618.773 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.693 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.232 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.114 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2970 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3114 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2970 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3114 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 7745

Compare specifications (specs)