NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 736 MHz
• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 35.33 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 576 vs 288
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 423
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 vs 27.232
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 3114
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 3114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1882
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 vs 5220
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 13.806
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 546.51
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 vs 1.535
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.114 vs 38.664
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1435
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3300
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1435
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3300

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1882 1914
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	431 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5220 7009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.806 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.51 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.535 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.524 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.664 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 3356

Compare specifications (specs)