NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 736 MHz
• 8.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 35.33 GTexel / s
• 10.7x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 288
• 5.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 31% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1914
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 7009
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 18.456
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 618.773
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.693
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 27.232
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 50.114
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 2970
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 2970

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 319
• 9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3114 vs 344
• 10.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 312
• 9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3114 vs 344
• 10.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2737 1914
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10550 7009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.948 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	968.568 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.58 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.988 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.144 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3356

Compare specifications (specs)