NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 513 MHz
• Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
• Around 1% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 152 Watt
• Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 388
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 16.451
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 511.131
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.232 vs 17.065
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.114 vs 46.591
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2602
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3316
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2602
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

• Around 22% higher pipelines: 352 vs 288
• 2.5x more maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1939 vs 1914
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7339 vs 7009
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 vs 1.693

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1914 1939
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	423 388
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7009 7339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.456 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	618.773 511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.693 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.232 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.114 46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2970 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3114 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2970 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3114 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3316

Compare specifications (specs)