NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 675 MHz
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 362.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1268 vs 556
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 264 vs 134
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2011 vs 1 July 2009 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops vs 362.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1268 vs 556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 264 vs 134 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
- Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1268 | 556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 264 | 134 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.598 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF116 | G92B |
Launch date | 30 May 2011 | 1 July 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1158 | 1161 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 675 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 362.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion / sec | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |