NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 1261
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 13.598
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 3275
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1857
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 3275

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 261 vs 244
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4919 vs 4258
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 404.618 vs 251.09
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 1.144
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 vs 10.872
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.123 vs 13.423

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1330 1261
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	244 261
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4258 4919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.67 13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	251.09 404.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.144 1.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.872 25.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.423 44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2351 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3520 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2351 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3520 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3341

Compare specifications (specs)