AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 261
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 vs 4919
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 44.123
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 30 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 261 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 vs 4919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 vs 44.123 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 24.8 billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1261 vs 520
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.598 vs 7.005
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 404.618 vs 144.131
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 0.952
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 vs 17.551
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1857 vs 1039
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1783
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 2270
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1857 vs 1039
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1783
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 2270
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1261 vs 520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.598 vs 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 vs 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 vs 0.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 vs 17.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 2270 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 1261 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 261 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 4919 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.005 | 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | 44.123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Mars | GF116 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 30 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1171 | 1173 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |