NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 24.8 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 23.3x better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 14.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1261 vs 85
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 261 vs 242
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 778
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 778
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 May 2011 vs 1 February 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1261 vs 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 261 vs 242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 778 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1261 | 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 261 | 242 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4924 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.598 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 778 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 778 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF116 | G86 |
| Launch date | 30 May 2011 | 1 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1171 | 1174 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 800 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion / sec | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIATesla C1060
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
