NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 219 Watt
• 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3800 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 36.499
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 165.39 vs 123.354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 674.215 vs 588.094
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 vs 3.205
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 vs 30.455
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 4921
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1577
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1671
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 4921
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1577
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.695 36.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.094 674.215
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.205 3.967
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.455 36.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.39 123.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 3357

Compare specifications (specs)