NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs ATI Radeon X1550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 and ATI Radeon X1550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 18.3x more texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 800 MHz
- 58.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3931 vs 67
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 253
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 December 2010 vs 1 January 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3931 vs 67 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 vs 253 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1550
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 219 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3931 | 67 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 | 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Radeon X1550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | R500 |
| Code name | GF110 | RV515 |
| Launch date | 7 December 2010 | 1 January 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Place in performance rating | 708 | 711 |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 480 | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 27 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
