NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 versus ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.7 billion / sec versus 68.0 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) versus 1 GB
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 versus 2213
- 6.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 versus 1857
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 versus 18.789
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 versus 1.775
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 versus 43.496
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 24 March 2011 versus 23 September 2009 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec versus 68.0 GTexel / s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 versus 2213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 versus 1857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 versus 18.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 versus 1.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 versus 43.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3671 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Environ 56% de pipelines plus haut: 1600 versus 1024
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,720.0 gflops versus 2x 1,244.2 gflops
- Environ 94% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 188 Watt versus 365 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 1707 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 versus 394
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 versus 1116.126
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 versus 107.239
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 versus 4118
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 3330
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 versus 4118
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 3330
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1600 versus 1024 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,720.0 gflops versus 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt versus 365 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 1707 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 versus 394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 versus 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 versus 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 versus 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 versus 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3330 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 2213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 | 1857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | 18.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | 1339.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | 1.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | 43.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | 245.813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | 4541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF110 | Cypress |
Date de sortie | 24 March 2011 | 23 September 2009 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 779 | 782 |
Prix maintenant | $184 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | 850 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1600 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 365 Watt | 188 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | 282 mm |
Options SLI | Quad | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 327.7 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1707 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity |